Bob Owens

The saddest truth in politics is that people get the leaders they deserve

Holder to commit perjury and renew calls for gun control today

Written By: Bob - Nov• 08•11

Embattled U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is scheduled to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and an advanced copy of his testimony obtained by the Daily Caller suggests that he is going to attack the investigation and call for gun control instead of coming clean.

Holder’s prepared testimony does not discuss his May 3 testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, an appearance during which investigators say he either lied, intentionally misled Congress or exhibited outright incompetence when answering questions about when he first learned about the failed gun-walking program.

Two congressmen, House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, asked him the same question, and Holder answered the same way each time: He said he first learned of Operation Fast and Furious just a few weeks earlier.

Holder continues to claim Operation Fast and Furious was a “local” program run out of Phoenix, Ariz., despite mounting evidence to the contrary. Most recently, Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, the head of the DOJ’s criminal division and Holder’s top deputy, confessed last week to at least some responsibility for Operation Fast and Furious.

“Today, I would like to correct some of the inaccurate — and irresponsible — accusations surrounding Fast and Furious,” Holder’s prepared testimony reads. “Some of the overheated rhetoric might lead you to believe that this local, Arizona-based operation was somehow the cause of the epidemic of gun violence in Mexico. In fact, Fast and Furious was a flawed response to, not the cause of, the flow of illegal guns from the United States into Mexico.”

This is direct and purposeful lie, and a desperate attempt to keep those Obama Administration officials responsible for this plot out of prison.

Operation Fast and Furious was one of ten alleged gun-walking operations in five states that saw U.S. federal agents provide firearms that Democrats have previously tried to ban in America to narco-terrorists and criminal gangs. Multiple U.S. attorneys, the directors of nearly every law enforcement agency within the executive branch, and top Justice Department officials participated in meetings about the gun-walking operation, and communicated about the operation directly to the White House National Security Council.

The case against Holder lacks a single “smoking gun” document, but the overwhelming preponderance of evidence leaves little doubt that he knew of the operation, as his top deputies all attended meeting and had documented detailed knowledge of the program, including the fact that the plot involved providing weapons to violent narcotics cartels with no intention of tracking them, only interest in tracing them after they were used in crimes.

Mexican Attorney General Marisela Morales considers the plot a “betrayal” of the relationship between the United States and Mexico, and has launched two investigations of her own. She has stated that the Obama Administration’s gun-walking plot provided weapons that were used to murder 200 Mexican national, in addition to the three U.S. federal agents shot with walked guns. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and ICE Agent Jaime Zapata were both killed, while ICE agent Victor Avila was seriously injured.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


  1. The Bureau of Artifice and Two Faced Equivocators have consistantly ignored Congress and other officials to include the Supreme Court on a regular basis for decades. This is an unfortunate fact that continues to be an issue and I expect no difference in F&F. They will lie, cheat, and play their little games past the point of frustration and no one will be held accountable. People will be angry for a little while until they find a new soap box to stand on, and all will be forgotten. I, for one, will never let this go. Not until every worthless turd involved is flushed down the toilet. Figuratively or litterally… the People’s choice.

    If there is one kind of new legislation I would support it would be the requirement of a signature for the person responsible for any government act. It would require the official to actually sign a document detailing the action to be carried out. There’s no denying that. You can’t say someone else signed it or blame it on an assistant or secretary. If you screw up…. it’s on you. That simple. The legislation must also be written in plain English.

  2. […] used his opening statement to shift the blame to the American gun dealers — whom his Department forced to supply weapons to the cartels — and […]