Bob Owens

The saddest truth in politics is that people get the leaders they deserve

Daley: The myth of a democratic socialist society funded by capitalism is finished

Written By: Bob - Sep• 03•12

Lexington Green, April 19, 1775.

Whatever the outcome of the American presidential election, one thing is certain: the fighting of it will be the most significant political event of the decade. Last week’s Republican national convention sharpened what had been until then only a vague, inchoate theme: this campaign is going to consist of the debate that all Western democratic countries should be engaging in, but which only the United States has the nerve to undertake. The question that will demand an answer lies at the heart of the economic crisis from which the West seems unable to recover. It is so profoundly threatening to the governing consensus of Britain and Europe as to be virtually unutterable here, so we shall have to rely on the robustness of the US political class to make the running.

What is being challenged is nothing less than the most basic premise of the politics of the centre ground: that you can have free market economics and a democratic socialist welfare system at the same time. The magic formula in which the wealth produced by the market economy is redistributed by the state – from those who produce it to those whom the government believes deserve it – has gone bust. The crash of 2008 exposed a devastating truth that went much deeper than the discovery of a generation of delinquent bankers, or a transitory property bubble. It has become apparent to anyone with a grip on economic reality that free markets simply cannot produce enough wealth to support the sort of universal entitlement programmes which the populations of democratic countries have been led to expect.

…Contrary to what many know-nothing British observers seem to think, the message coming out of Tampa was not Tea Party extremism. It was just a reassertion of the basic values of American political culture: self-determination, individual aspiration and genuine community, as opposed to belief in the state as the fount of all social virtue. Romney caught this rather nicely in his acceptance speech, with the comment that the US was built on the idea of “a system that is dedicated to creating tomorrow’s prosperity rather than trying to redistribute today’s.” Or as Marco Rubio put it in his speech, Obama is “trying ideas that people came to America to get away from”.

Janet Daley is an American expatriate living in England, provides a bit of perspective about the goings-on in her home country that comes from distance.

Her September 1 column deserves to be read in its entirety, and it is weighty enough to consider bookmarking and returning to it again.

If Daley is correct—and obviously, I happen to think she is—then the 2012 election is easily the most important American election in the past century. Our choice is to return to the “basic values of American political culture” as she puts it, or to rush headlong into the proven failure that is European-style socialism.  Romney-Ryan represents the reassertion of the American dream. Obama-Biden represent the continuation of failed ideas proven wrong time and again in Europe.

Daley seems hopeful that this election can be the first step towards fixing America, and if Romney-Ryan are successful, they will be an example to drag Europe back from the brink of collapse.

Mike Vanderboegh, cranky old militiaman that he is, isn’t so sure that out problems can be solved electorally, and suspects that the dependence class will react violently when separated from the public teat. If I am reading him correctly, those souls that have been dependent on the thieving political class (and the political thieves themselves) in both parties have built their lives around parasitically draining the public coffers to the point of engorgement, and he believes they will not let go of this “everything for nothing” arrangement without resorting to violence.

I don’t know if Daley is more nearly correct and that we can step away from the brink of collapse with the power of the ballot box, or if we will be forced as Vanderboegh suspects into civil unrest if the takers react violently to having to earn their keep.

My advice would be to prepare for either eventuality, and to pray to God for deliverance without violence.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


  1. John Jacobs says:

    Luckily those medicare and social security recipients move pretty slow, even when angered, and should make fairly easy targets even for a mediocre marksman ;-)

  2. emdfl says:

    Some of us who spent 50 years paying into that Ponzi scheme known as SS and 30 years doing the same for medicrap might take umbridge at your comment there, John.

  3. david7134 says:

    SSI and Medicare are two programs for which I paid into and will get my money back from. This despite the fact that I could easily afford to pay my own way. The reason for my assertion is that money was taken from my checks when I could least afford it. It really meant the difference in the quality and quantity of food that I obtained, much less that nature of what I was renting to live in. Then when I was really making money, a large, disproportionate amount was taken out of may earnings for these programs, in addition to the enormous state, and federal taxes. So I want that money back.

    Now look at any pie chart that documents were money is going out to the federal government. SSI and Medicare are certainly large. But consider that federal pensions are lumped into this. They constitute at least 30% of the burden. In other words while I get pennies on the dollar for retirement, they get a bundle and better health coverage. Then other slices of the pie are the way we still pay out welfare to folks, now through the IRS.

    Finally, I still think that if you want to cut back on the federal government, get rid of departments. That would mean TSA, Homeland insecurity, agriculture, education and all the other areas of of the federal government that are in our way and rob our freedom. A good example is that kids are out of school here in Louisiana because HS came in and said a hurricane was in the area and shut down the school system. My mouth fell open at this at it was only a steady mist and minor winds that came. The same happened around the state, all so nothing would embarrass the great O.

    Our country is seriously broken.

  4. Eric says:

    There is indeed a remnant of the spirit that build America, but I have to keep reminding myself never to underestimate the power of government dependency. It’s like a creeping cancer. Those whose livelihood depends on government largese are mostly forever that way.