The interwebs get blowed up.
I know I’ve been quiet here the past few days, and there is a good reason for that: I’ve picked up a new full-time job that I am not yet at liberty to discuss. A nice side benefit of that new job was a trip to the office on Thursday to meet my boss and co-workers for the first time (every one of them seems very nice), and then we went to a very posh upscale indoor shooting range on Friday as part of a company outing. One of the other new hires that started this week made the comment I was thinking, “can we do this every week?”
They divided us up into experienced shooters and inexperienced shooters, and sent those of us with some trigger time in a separate range. Inside, there were different firearms at each station, and to my delight, most were firearms I’ve never shot before, or were equipped in a configuration I’d not used.
In left-to-right order, they were (to the best I can recall):
- traditional semi AKM-pattern in wood (Century Arms import, maybe?)
- Springfield Armory SOCOM II, extended top-rail variant
- 12-gauge pump with slugs (didn’t catch the model, but looked like a Mossberg)
- Daniels Defense AR-15 carbine, with a low-power Trijicon scope and Mako handguard and foregrip
- no-name 1911 in .45 ACP
- HK USP in .45 ACP
- Glock 21 in .45 ACP
- CZ-75-type (didn’t catch manufacturer) in .40 S&W
- Springfield Armory EMP (compact 1911 in .40 S&W)
- Beretta 96 (basically, a Beretta 92 in .40 S&W)
Believe it or not, I’d never fired an AKM until yesterday, even though I’ve had some trigger time and have even hunted deer with an SKS. It was obviously designed for someone much smaller that me, but it was accurate enough, had negligible recoil, and I can see why folks would like it.
I skipped firing the SOCOM II. I picked it up and looked through the crude ghost ring sights, and simply didn’t see the point. Put some glass on it like it was designed to shoot, and I bet it would be fun.
I skipped firing the bead-sighted 12-gauge firing slugs. Been there, done that, and wouldn’t get any venison out of it. I was very impressed, however, that one of the ladies fired it, rubbed her shoulder, and went back to fire it again.
The DD AR carbine with the low-power Trijicon? Loved it. All of my shooting experience is as a paper-puncher, plinker, and deer hunter, so I have a very traditional rifleman’s skillset, honed to a pretty fair edge for that kind of shooting by Appleseed (which everyone really must do, in my opinion). One of the instructors/RSOs was a former Marine rifleman who had also been on President Bush’s personal security detail, and he showed me how to square up and run the carbine in a much more tactical way, which is more about speed and agility and logevity than tiny groups. It was an eye opener, and now I really want some good tactical training.
The no-name 1911 shot like a no-name well-used 1911. No surprises.
I now have an inkling of why the HK fanboys love their guns. I really liked the sights on the USP, it fit my hand well, and shot very accurately for me, more than any of the other full-size pistols. Very nice firearm.
This was my first time shooting a Glock 21. I don’t care for the Glock grip angle and tend to shoot low with it, but adjusted my grip and was doing fine by the end of the first magazine. Nothing fancy, but utterly reliable.
The CZ-75/Tangfolio-ish gun shot fine, but some how struck me overall as “meh.” I think I’m spoiled on safe-action and single-action triggers.
My first and for the longest time only handgun was a 1911, and I’ll always have a soft-spot in my heart for the platform, and so when I moved over to the nearly new EMP compact in .40 S&W I got really excited. Then I started shooting it, and got even more excited. I shot that better than any handgun on the line, and indeed, better than my personal pistols. I never shoot anything other than center mass with my XD (because that is what you aim for in a self-defense gun), but with the EMP, I felt confident enough to shoot headshots by the 3rd magazine, and kept them all center-lined (though there was some shooter-induced vertical stringing because I got excited). It and the DD with the Trijicon were the guns that gave me “the grin” you like to see at the range.
The less I say about the Beretta 96, the better. Horrible trigger, grip, and sights. I kept my rounds on the target, but had no confidence in the gun at all. I felt like I was running a dowsing rod.
Once I’d played with all the toys on our side, I wandered over to the range with the less-experienced shooters, where a few hadn’t fired at all by the time I’d made it there. Our office manager had never fired a gun and was shaking she was so nervous, but after a little confidence-building and coaching she did pretty well with an M&P 9. I then gave her an old-school 9mm AR with the carry-handle fixed sights, and she seemed to enjoy shooting that. She gave me a hug afterward, and kept her target to show her boyfriend, so maybe we managed to create a new shooter, which would make my day.
It was a nice trip, and it was a joy to shoot and learn for a change, instead of instructing.
National Geographic Channel’s new series Doomsday Castle kicks off tonight at 10:00 PM (ET) . It is a spin-off of the channel’s highest-rated series, Doomsday Preppers, which begins its 3rd season at 9:00 PM.
There are going to be a lot of reviews of the show and the cast’s performance on this episode in particular, and a lot of bad-mouthing of the idea of a castle in the 21st century. It’s an easy slam-dunk for any critic or mocker to make, and I’ll be watching the reviews with some bemusement, because they’ll be missing the point entirely.
Silly English knnnnnnnn-ighuts, Doomsday Castle isn’t about building a castle. It’s about a man attempting to cement together the remains of two families, and leave a legacy he can be proud of, so that he can leave this earth as the kind of father he never had.
Brent Sr., the patriach of the admittedly dysfunctional clan, sat beside me during lunch during the press junket to the castle. I’m a military strategy, tactics, and history geek (yes, that kind of annoying civilian), and so I asked him why he sunk roughly a million dollars to build a castle, of all things, on a remote mountainside.
After all, he already had a hidden bunker buried in the earth under what is now the castle’s floor. He could have easily built your average mountain vacation house to hide it, or built a home from insulated concrete forms (ICF) that would be as durable as his concrete filled block castle, but not as expensive or time-consuming to make. Why a castle?
His words, as accurately as I can recall them, were, “I couldn’t get my kids to come up here just to build a house. I could get them here to help me build a castle.”
This is a family with a lot of problems, more than one arrest (I’m sure the gossip rags have the stories cued up and ready to run if the show proves to be a hit), and it can be gloriously rough around the edges. All those rough edges aside, they’re trying to mend, and trying to find common ground.
I’m willing to be that if this show makes it big, it because it isn’t really a show about a castle. The castle is a MacGuffin. This could be, or at least should be, a show about redemption and second chances. We’ll see how well they do as the season progresses.
No wonder King Putt has threatened CIA assets and attempted to hide military personnel who were privy to what happened the night the U.S. Ambassador to Libya was killed in a raid; the President’s blatant dereliction of duty armed al Qaeda with weapons powerful enough to blast airliners out of the sky:
A former U.S. Attorney who represents whistle-blowers with knowledge of what happened when armed militants attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya last year says 400 surface-to-air missiles were ‘taken from Libya’ during the attack, and that the U.S. intelligence community is terrified they might be used to shoot down airliners.
Joe diGenova, whose wife Victoria Toensing – a former deputy assistant attorney general – also represents Benghazi witnesses and others with knowledge of the terror attack, told WMAL radio that the loss of those missiles is also one the reason the U.S. State Department shut down 19 embassies across the Middle East last week.
‘A lot of people have come forward to share information with us,’ he said during the radio station’s ‘Mornings On The Mall’ program Monday morning.
‘We have learned that one of the reasons the administration is so deeply concerned’ is that ‘there were 400 surface-to-air missiles stolen, and that they are … in the hands of many people, and that the biggest fear in the U.S. intelligence community is that one of these missiles will be used to shoot down an airliner. 400 missiles, surface-to-air missiles, taken from Libya.’
Asked if the missiles are now ‘in the hands of al-Qaeda operatives,’ DiGenova replied, ‘That is what these people are telling us.’
I’d like to remind you that Obama refused to give cross border authority to a force of 100 Recon Marines spinning up at Sigonella NAS, told Green Berets in Tripoli to stand down, and refused to call the region’s elite Delta CIF force to come to the rescue of more than two dozen and perhaps as many as 40 Americans under attack.
He had his campaign narrative of “al Qaeda is on the run” to preserve, and the destruction of a U.S. consulate and the possible over-running of a CIA position in a dusty desert version of Custer’s Last Stand is what he was willing to gamble. That he was also negligent enough to deliver al Qaeda hundreds of the exact weapons they’ve most wanted is a clear sign of the dangerously arrogant incompetence that permeates this White House.
But don’t worry folks; when airliners start dropping on our heads, he’ll find a way to “blame Bush.”
There are many thousands of shooting instructors in the United States, who teach tens of thousands of students to shoot every year. Despite the best of intentions and the best of precautions, mistakes sometimes occur, and accidents happen.
Most of the time that comes as a mechanical breakdown of a gun that is relatively minor. Occasionally, there is an early or late shot due to a lack of concentration that is fired downrange. On much more rare occasions a gun will catastrophically fail, permanently damaging the gun and injuring a shooter.
The nightmare scenario for any instructor is the harm of a student, especially at the hands of the instructor. 73-year-old veteran instructor Terry J. Dunlap Sr. has now lived that nightmare:
A gun-safety class in Fairfield County for people seeking permits to carry concealed weapons went wrong on Saturday when the instructor accidentally shot a student.
Terry J. Dunlap Sr., who runs a shooting range and training center at 6995 Coonpath Rd. near Lancaster, was demonstrating a hand gun in the classroom when he fired a .38-caliber bullet that ricocheted off a desk and into student Michael Piemonte’s right arm.
Dunlap, 73, also is a long-time Violet Township trustee who is running for re-election in November.
Piemonte feels lucky. It could have been worse, he said today. He and his wife, Allison, both 26 and residents of Pataskala in Licking County, attended the day-long concealed-carry class together, he said.
Fortunately, several students in the course were nurses and they were able to render first aid until EMS arrived to transport Mr. Peimonte to the hospital. He was treated and released that evening, and so it appears the wound was relatively minor.
From what I’ve picked up, Dunlap has been instructing civilians and police for decades without a mishap. A former student claims in the comments of the article that he is among the most safety-conscious instructors he has ever known. All it took was a few seconds of violating several of the Four Rules for those decades of good work to be tarnished.
Of course, part of the problem with the “four rules” is that there should be a a fifth rule observed at any time there is more than person present.
We all own the safety rules.
If an observant student quickly reminded Mr. Dunlap that he hadn’t cleared the weapon in front of the class, this scenario could have been avoided.